Steven Meisel New York, 1989 - Roxanne Lowit

“In ordinary parlance, neo-liberalism refers to the repudiation of Keynesian welfare state economics and the ascendance of the Chicago School of political economy – von Hayek, Friedman, et al. In popular usage, neo-liberalism is equated with a radically free market: maximized competition and free trade achieved through economic de-regulation, elimination of tariffs, and a range of monetary and social policies favorable to business and indifferent toward poverty, social deracination, cultural decimation, long term resource depletion and environmental destruction. Neo-liberalism is most often invoked in relation to the Third World, referring either to NAFTA-like schemes that increase the vulnerability of poor nations to the vicissitudes of globalization or to International Monetary Fund and World Bank policies which, through financing packages attached to “restructuring” requirements, yank the chains of every aspect of Third World existence, including political institutions and social formations. For progressives, neo-liberalism is thus a pejorative not only because it conjures economic policies which sustain or deepen local poverty and the subordination of peripheral to core nations, but also because it is compatible with, and sometimes even productive of, authoritarian, despotic, paramilitaristic, and/or corrupt state forms and agents within civil society. While these referents capture an important effect of neo-liberalism, they also reduce neo-liberalism to a bundle of economic policies with inadvertent political and social consequences: they eschew the political rationality that both organizes these policies and reaches beyond the market. Moreover, these referents do not capture the neo in neo-liberalism, tending instead to treat the contemporary phenomenon as little more than a revival of classical liberal political economy. Finally, they obscure the specifically political register of neo-liberalism in the First World, that is, its powerful erosion of liberal democratic institutions and practices in places like the United States. My concern in this essay is with these neglected dimensions of neo-liberalism.”

—

Wendy Brown, Neoliberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy

Oldie but a goody re recent conversations.

Lygia Clark | Ovo, Estudo, 1958

Marcel Duchamp, Rotorelief n°1 – Corolles, (offset lithograph on cardboard), 1935 [Centre Pompidou, Paris. © Association Marcel Duchamp / Adagp, Paris. Photo: Service de la documentation photographique du MNAM]

Visual Diary | Nydia Lilian

The Secret Felix Nussbaum 1939 Private collection Painting - oil on canvas Height: 61 cm (24.02 in.), Width: 74.5 cm (29.33 in.)

Hilma af Klint (Swedish, 1862-1944)

The Teaching of Buddhism, No. 3d, 1920

Oil on canvas

37.5 x 28 cm (14.76 x 11.02 in)

Stiftelsen Hilma af Klints Verk

hexy. nottingham

Weronika Dudka

Paco Knöller, Aufwachraum, (pencil and colored pencil on paper), 2015 [Galerie Thomas Schulte, Berlin. © Paco Knöller]

Cy Twombly, Letter of Resignation