16 books everyone needs to read at least once because people will reference them in front of you your entire life:
“the faerie queene,” by edmund spenser. this poem is divided up into six books, which you should read, if for no other reason than the fact that there’s an exclusive book club at harvard university for the select few people who have finished all six sections. and honestly, who wouldn’t want to read something that forms the foundation of a semi-secret, decades-old book club at harvard?
“romeo and juliet,” and “othello,” both by shakespeare. these plays fall on the exact same spot on the dark academia spectrum. they both involve two lovers who die because of communication issues. but regardless, they’re both super important to read because there are so many references to them, both in other pieces of classic lit., and in modern culture
“the picture of dorian gray,” by oscar wilde. if you can’t tell, this is my favorite book ever. if you can get past the purple prose, it’s like the most ‘dark academia’ book ever. it’s got references to other famous pieces of literature (which i’ll include on the list), lots of gay shit, a dramatic young adult who loves shakespeare, and ofc, murder
“the brothers karamazov,” by fyodor dostoevsky. actually started reading this one to impress a boy; i think that perhaps he and i have different concepts of what is considered impressive, but the book has turned out amazing, so i’m happy
“the prince,” by niccolo machiavelli. alright, so this isn’t classic literature so much as it is politics, but honestly, so many people talk about ‘machiavellianism’ without ever having read the original Machiavellian treatise, and it would be so much better to just read the book and then be able to cite machiavelli himself at your next political-philosophy discussion.
“the count of monte cristo,” by alexandre dumas. another classic that i heard people talk about for long enough that i finally gave up and read the book. now i can talk about it too, and pretend to be smart
“the canterbury tales,” by geoffrey chaucer. these are classics. they’re filled to the brim with medieval language and sexual innuendo, but that’s part of what makes them so wonderful. if that’s not enough of a selling point, ‘the tale of the deathly hallows’ from “harry potter” is super similar to ‘the pardoner’s tale’ from this book.
“the divine comedy,” by dante alighieri. includes a crap ton of great history references and some super sick burns directed towards the corrupt people of dante’s time.
“meditations,” by marcus aurelius. the original metaphysical journal. probably the epitome of ‘light academia’ if i’ve ever read one
“the great gatsby,” by f. scott fitzgerald. jay gatsby is low-key super relatable…and so is nick, the third wheel…and so is daisy, who feels like women are forced by society to be ‘beautiful little fools’
“the iliad,” by homer. you can’t justify reading “the song of achilles” by madeline miller until you’ve read the original. enough said.
“frankenstein,” by mary shelley. not only is this a great books in terms of philosophical potential, but there are so many great things to debate about in it. and, it’s written by a woman :)
“beowulf,” author unknown. although i make no claims about the original anglo saxon, my favorite english translation is, like the iliad and the odyssey, particularly enjoyable because of its dactylic hexameter.
“oedipus rex,” by sophocles. my favorite book in 9th grade, though god knows why my mother let me read it then
“metamorphoses,” by ovid. a collection of my all-time favorite greek myths, which every single person needs to read because it explains how the ancient greeks believed the world operated, from the way the sun rises, to the reason we hear echoes.
“the aeneid,” by virgil. suggested by @catilinas :) the final addition to the holy iliad/odyssey/aeneid trinity, written hundreds of years after the last part, by a different author, and in latin instead of the original greek. chronologically ocurrs at about the same time as the odyssey, although from the trojan perspective.
and maybe it’s just me, but there’s something about being able to connect with people over classic books that is really enjoyable. it makes me feel like some literature student in the early 1900’s who wears tweed (or glasses or something) and wanders through hallways with a cup of coffee ranting about existentialism ;))
if anyone has any to books to add to the list, just comment or reblog and i’ll edit the original.
NEPTUNE IN THE 10th HOUSE; Observations
No one can get a good grasp on these types. Their persona is an illusion and many wouldn't recognize them in a private setting. The first thing people notice about these types is their kind nature. They are open minded and non-judgmental. They see people as the individuals that they are, because they would like to be understood in the same way. They struggle with finding their place in the world. Growing up, they may have always felt unusual or different. They spent a lot of their time alone with their fantasies, wishing to share them with others. As adults, they channel this energy into their long-term goals. People with this placement thrive as artists because of how easily they connect to the public, they understand what the public needs emotionally. They are in tune with the collective, but sometimes this can become overwhelming when they are trying to distinguish their own feelings. Neptune tenth housers frequently lose touch with reality and become confused when trying to set goals. They dream big, but struggle with managing day-to-day objectives. They have a hard time mapping out the future, and have a tendency of becoming trapped within delusions. When times get rough, they will do everything they can to avoid the uncomfortable truths of reality. Many with this placement turn to drugs and alcohol and have a significant relationship with substance abuse. Ultimately, these individuals prefer to go with the flow and like to see where life takes them. This type of mentality is healthy, but it wouldn’t hurt if more effort was put into the outcomes of their actions. They believe in fate and know they’ll always end up where they need to be, it is not easy for them to shake this mindset when needed. This passive attitude can lead to a lack of recognition within their careers, they don’t voice their talents. If people don’t recognize their talents, Neptune tenth housers go on to assume that it is because they're talentless. When in actuality, they are not expressing their talents enough. They doubt themselves and don’t like to impose themselves upon others. But, this risky attitude is needed for them to run into the type of fate they’ve dreamed about.
one of my deepest darkest secrets is that the taggie x rupert relationship dynamic is literal catnip to me it hits every time. give me rakish older man who's so ruthless he scorches the ground of any place he's ever called home and then goes back to his empty life in his empty house and tries to remember how to be human, put a girl in front of him who's so genuinely good and unsullied and a little vulnerable and so sure he can be better than who he's always been that she almost makes him believe he can do it too and then - and this is crucial - make it so he absolutely cannot touch her no matter what. and then sit back and watch me implode
imagesviaecossistemas
“If you don’t fight for what you want, don’t cry for what you lost.”
—
can we talk about this please… can this please be a thing we discuss…
𖦹ׂ 𓈒 🐇
sosotmi on instagram
We stan!!!!
chaotic good